I remember back when, if you had to research something, you had to get up off your butt and go all the way to the library to look it up and then come all the way back home (uphill, again!) to type it up. How the local transit system and Liquid Paper are still in use is beyond me. Keep citing your sources though, and make sure they're not all Wikipedia.
I remember when you were out at the bar and an argument broke out the result was often hours of yelling and debate sometimes followed by someone getting punched in the face. Those arguments seem to have tapered off with cries of "TO THE INTERNETS!" replacing violence. I think face punching still occurs, but it's probably for old fashioned violations like hitting on someone's girl or getting mind blowingly wasted.
Finally, I remember when the Internet was pure, and innocent, and wasn't the easiest way for money sucking lawyers to bulk up on billable hours. Yesterday's ambulance chasers are today's trademark miners - and the Internet is the reason it's so much easier than hopping in your car and hanging out near the busiest intersection in town waiting for the latest saga about the car that gets crushed in front of the candy store.
See what I did there?
Yes? Very good! Please keep reading.
No? It's okay, it was subtle. Please keep reading.
As a content provider I am more in tune with copyright and intellectual property than I every thought I would be. Honestly, had I known I would be a photographer, blogger, and writer back in my youth I probably would not have spent so much time staring at my classmates test papers and assignments. In spite of those transgressions I do have a healthy respect for the creators of content and for the most part it's a black-and-white discussion. I also understand that in some cases there are at least fifty shades of grey.
I'd like to think that the insanity started with Facebook and it's ultimate desire to own every piece of information on the Internet. The day they filed for a trademark on the word "like" was a dark day for the Internet and a field day for lawyers. I'm sure other companies have marked singular, common words found in dictionaries everywhere but Facebook went the extra mile and added "face" and "book" to the list as well.
You know, I get it. I really do. Facebook doesn't want people taking advantage of their popularity or sullying the brand, but to what extent do they have to go to ensure this doesn't happen?
The answer to that apparently lies with the company King.com Limited, who on February 6, 2013 filed a trademark application for the word "candy". Special thanks to the CBC for bringing this to our attention and digging up the application status (that would have been a chore for a person much more patient than me). In case you didn't know, King.com makes the wildly popular app "Candy Crush Saga".
If you read the filing you'll see a laundry list of goods and services to which the trademark applies. To say that King.com Limited has cast a wide net would be the understatement of the year.
- "Calculating machines, Data processing equipment, namely, couplers"
- "Microphones; Baby monitors; Battery performance monitors"
- "Clothing... tights, trousers, under garments, underpants, underwear..."
- "Non-downloadable electronic publications in the nature of websites, e-books, online magazines, online newspapers, electronic journals, blogs, podcasts and mobile applications in the field of computer and video games" [emphasis mine]